Hollister Hartman, PhD: “The Weight of Evidence shows that Poor Mountain must be rejected as UNSUITABLE for siting the proposed wind project.”

Well, that should do it, don’t you think?  No sense plopping the 747 size turbines on Virginia’s Poor Mountain.  Heck, when conditions are “prime,” the turbines have a difficult time puffing out enough electricity to read by, especially if you want it available at a time when you actually want to read.  But this Poor Mountain area is UNSUITABLE for a wind project!

In the following study, provided to us courtesy of VA Wind, Hollister Hartman, PhD backs up the title statement with significant data, and a superlative resume as a siting expert.

Have a read and then, following, we’ll have a few comments, and concerns.  If you’d rather download the pdf link, here it is: (http://www.vawind.org/Assets/Docs/091510/Poor_Mountain_Siting_Analysis.pdf):

Interesting, isn’t it?  Makes you wonder why anyone, save the wind developer, would consider proceeding with this dud and risk the negative environmental issues that come with such projects.  Sure, environmental groups often justify the intrusion of industrial wind in pristine woodlands as a trade for the greater environmental good.  We happen to believe that industrial wind adds no value to our current or future energy needs, anywhere, but heck … there’s no need to even argue that point in this instance … is there?  After all, the Poor Mountain area is UNSUITABLE for a wind project!

But, as we often find when dealing with the wind crowd, logic takes a back seat to policy, and policy often ignores science.  Sometimes, you see, science doesn’t give you the answers you need to do business.

We would hope this is not the case with Poor Mountain.  Folks facing the arrival of industrial wind in their communities, which will forever alter their environment, finances … their very lives, rely heavily on experts for guidance.  It would be more than a shame if any organization would use strong arm tactics to suppress or limit discussion in an effort to force consensus.  Everyone knows that always comes back to haunt!

We hope all the information available on the Poor Mountain project is allowed to be presented and the very report prepared by Dr. Hartman we provide here is receiving the attention it deserves.  Folks faced with a critical decision deserve all viewpoints, and all the time necessary to air them.  Having all the facts on the table will lead folks to the best decision possible.

Should any organization, with opportunity to do so, shirk its responsibility to educate its public, it will surely face severe criticism; especially should the project they supported be deemed a failure.  This is especially true if the organization has, as its mission, the protection of the environment and, by extension, the very public it claims to serve.

It seems to us, if Poor Mountain is truly an UNSUITABLE area for a wind project as the good Dr. Hartman suggests, the potential risk for failure is considerable.  We hope everything is on the table.

AT Note:

Hollister Hartman received her BS Degree in Biology from Yale University and her PhD in Population Biology (Applied Mathematics) from the University of California, Riverside.  She also received certification in Multi-Attribute Decision Making from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Dr. Hartman’s professional siting experience includes instituting integration of Geographic Information Systems; managing geophysical/biocultural modeling for compliance of EPA regulations and developing/implementing site selection methodologies for Hard Mobile Launcher, Small ICBM and Peacekeeper deployment.

Additionally, she identified pivotal geological & engineering criteria underlying intractable nuclear waste repository siting issues for the U.S Department of Energy Yucca Mountain Project, overseeing project performance against Federal, state and local regulations.

Dr. Hartman served in leadership positions with the National Research Council, the American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics (AIAA) and numerous consortium appointments.

She serves her community as Vice Chair of the Sierra Club/Roanoke, VA Group; Member of the Franklin County Planning Commission Technical Advisory Committee and Technical Analyst for defenders of Poor Mountain, VA.

Dr. Hartman is the author of several publications related to the fields of Civil Engineering and Natural Resource Management.

Posted in Appalachian Mountains, Virginia Wind | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for September 16, 2010 (Updates throughout the day.)

Items of interest:

1-Guess who’s back with tin cup in hand? (thanks for the tip, AFA!)

Urge Immediate Senate Action on a National Renewable Electricity Standard

Well, before you make that call to your elected official consider thisthisthis and this … oh … and this.

2-If you haven’t visited Dr. Nina Pierpont’s informative web site, you really need to do so!

Wind Turbine Syndrome

3-“by buying in … you once again are supporting and add false credibility to, a significant environmental destruction

To CVPS (Central Vermont Public Service): Steer clear of wind – Rutland Herald

4-Industrial wind solution logic: If we make you really sick, we buy your home and you get out.

Wind turbine rule can be revised, panel says; Change would address possible health effects – National Wind Watch

5-Solution to the industrial wind problem – elections!

Neebing candidates oppose wind farm plans – Wind Concerns Ontario

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | 1 Comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for September 15, 2010 (Updates throughout the day.)

Interesting items:

1-Industrial wind math … 22=6.6

Maine Voices: Spruce Mountain wind project falls far short of what people should expect – The Portland Press Herald

2-Misleading statements from a wind developer?  Impossible! Incredible! Unlikely! Hmmm!

Maine wind proponents misinformedKaren Bessey Pease at the Bangor Daily News

3-Wind backer calls radar controversy “political.”  Wait, I thought he meant when the pro-wind Oregon Senator held the White House and DOD hostage.

Wind backer charges politics in radar debate – Your Abilene On-line

4-Noise, few jobs, environmental destruction, feeble power generation and paid for by the taxpayers … C’mon, Oregon!  What’s not to like?

Storm over wind energy brews in Union County – The Democrat Herald

5-“The Department of Energy projects that wind power production capacity will more than double by 2014 fueled by federal tax subsidies, economic recovery stimulus spending, and state renewable energy mandates.”  Translated, that would be “your money” and “your money” and regulations demanding “your money.

Wind Turbines Are Beautiful … but a tad expensive. – Reason

6-oh! … and then there’s this from that pesky Robert Bryce:

Wind Energy’s Real Problems: (Hint: It Has Nothing to Do With The Wall Street Journal) – Energy Tribune

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for September 14, 2010 (Updates throughout the day.)

Items of interest:

1-AWEA’s claim that industrial wind contributes significantly to carbon emission reduction meets a serious challenge.

Jon Boone eviscerates “AWEA’s evidentiary offerings on behalf of wind’s carbon saving/fossil fuel slaying potential.” – Allegheny Treasures

2-Had to post this just for the headline which, if it were true, industrial wind might actually work.  Sad to say, the folks signing land leases don’t seem to know that fact.

Wind farm proposal in western Sangamon picks up steam – The State Journal-Register

3-“Let’s hope the Scottish Government takes notice before it is too late” – STRUAN STEVENSON, Conservative Euro MP for Scotland  (Uh, by your title Sir, it would seem your wish has already been granted.)

Letter: Danish sound the retreat over wind farms – The Scotsman

4-Bet you didn’t see this one coming … Japan threatening to sue Canada over requirements that favor companies using made-in-Ontario equipment over those using foreign-made equipment, violating Canada’s international trade obligations.

Japan takes aim at Ontario’s green energy plan – CTV-Toronto

5-Seems Estonia has it figured out … maybe they can alert US politicians.

Subsidies Spoiling Renewable Energy Producers, Says Competition Authority – Estonia Public Broadcasting

6-Oh, I don’t know!  Stop is an excellent blade speed setting.

CEO: No easy resolution to wind turbine noise – Boston.com

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Jon Boone eviscerates “AWEA’s evidentiary offerings on behalf of wind’s carbon saving/fossil fuel slaying potential.”

We are very pleased to offer Jon Boone’s most recent commentary on industrial wind, “Overblown.”  In this work, Mr. Boone, an environmentalist recognized internationally for his knowledge about the wind industry, challenges the latest American Wind Energy Association claim of reduced emissions resulting from industrial wind.

For your convenience, we provide Mr. Boone’s excellent work in its entirety:

Mr. Boone is an Environmentalist, Artist, Author, Documentary Producer, and Formal Intervenor in Wind Installation Hearings.  We encourage you to read his many commentaries here at Allegheny Treasures, including these two very informative posts:  A Conversation with Jon Boone – Toward a Better Understanding of Industrial Wind Technology and A Conversation with Jon Boone – Industrial Wind and the Environment.

We encourage you to visit Mr. Boone’s web site – Stop Ill Wind, to take advantage of his extensive work on the topic of industrial wind.

Posted in Environment, industrial wind v fossil fuel, Jon Boone, Windpower Industry False Claims | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for September 13, 2010 (Updates throughout the day.)

Items of interest:

1-First of the new Jon Boone series is up – A MUST READ!

OVERBLOWN: Windpower on the Firing Line (Part 1) – MasterResource

2-Sinovel’s remarkable growth – visionary entrepreneur, favorable government policies and “foreign-made machines that would serve as “blueprints”

Dreamlike ascent for wind power’s newest star: How did Sinovel skyrocket in just five years? – MarketWatch

3-“The whole world is nuking up while the USA is nuking down.  This nation will have a real energy crisis if the current trend continues.

Wasting Clean, Cheap Power – American Thinker

4-And now that the “rascals” have arrived back in DC, this is well worth a second read:

Forcing Consumers to Buy Renewable Energy – Congress pretends to solve an energy crisis – Reason.com

5-Small wonder when “as much as 80 percent of some green programs, including $2.3 billion of manufacturing tax credits, went to foreign firms that employed workers primarily in countries including China, South Korea and Spain, rather than in the United States.

‘Green’ jobs no longer golden in stimulus – Renewablesbiz (tip of the hat to Frank O’Hara of the AFA)

6-“It seems that the more “free” electricity we have, the higher its cost. My utility bill includes a charge that makes me pay for the expensive “green” toys producing expensive, unpredictable, and poor-quality power.”

Half-way to Doubling Renewable Energy – Energy Tribune (Thanks to Jon Boone)

7-Some serious logic offered by Bruce Everett, a homeowner in Chatham, (Massachusetts) who teaches energy economics at the Fletcher School at Tufts.

Wind turbines a poor investment – Free Republic

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for September 12, 2010

Items of Interest:

1-“It is, after all, our backyard they’re playing in.”

LOIS HENRY: LA is after Kern’s wind – at Bakersfield (California) Online

2-I suppose, had they been listed, fun facts #15 thru #27 would have mentioned why industrial wind doesn’t work as a reliable, affordable, secure and environmentally friendly energy source.  And, I don’t know, is it enough that an energy source the country is to rely on for commerce and comfort is “neat?”

Wind Power Fun Facts – at Newbizine

3-LA Times desperate to face down another wind problem – all it will take is some more of your money.  (The “renewable leader” is, after all, broke!)

Wind farms and the radar problem – “‘Wind farms interfere with commercial and military radar systems. That’s stalling some projects, but it doesn’t have to.” – at the LA Times (Oh, did I mention that the fixes are “expensive!”)

4-Environmental activist says, “Clearly, a solar panel on the White House roof won’t solve climate change.”  We agree and add this qualifier, “the White House or anywhere else.”

Barack Obama: ‘no’ to solar panels on the White House roof – at Guardian.co.uk

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

UK’s Telegraph: “Long a role model for green activists,” Denmark has become “one of the first countries to turn against the (wind) turbines.”

Jon Boone called our attention to this little reported issue last week.  Now the UK’s Andrew Gilligan has picked up on the story in today’s Telegraph article “An ill wind blows for Denmark’s green energy revolution

Mr. Gilligan’s article seems an excellent summary of issues Mr. Boone and other US experts have been making for years.  A few key points from the article:

  • Danes pay some of Europe’s highest energy tariffs – on average, more than twice those in Britain. Under public pressure, Denmark’s ruling Left Party is curbing the handouts to the wind industry.
  • “People are fed up with having their property devalued and sleep ruined by noise from large wind turbines,” says the association’s president, Boye Jensen Odsherred. “We receive constant calls from civic groups that want to join.”
  • Wind’s key disadvantage – in Denmark, as elsewhere – is its unpredictability and uncontrollability. Most of the time, the wind does not blow at the right speeds to generate electricity. And even when it does, that is often at times when little electricity is needed – in the middle of the night, for instance.
  • “They (Denmark) don’t get 20 per cent of their electricity from wind. The truth is that a much larger unit, consisting of Denmark and Germany, has managed to get about 7 per cent – and that only because of a fortuitous link with Norwegian and Swedish hydropower.”

Be sure to read Mr. Gilligan’s full column at this link.

Posted in Denmark, industrial wind failure, Jon Boone | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Putin: “Nuclear energy only alternative to oil, gas.” Rejects other alternative energy approaches as “claptrap.”

Seems our Russian friends have a renewable energy plan, and it’s interesting what it doesn’t emphasize.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin stated at the September 9 meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club that “nuclear energy is the only alternative to traditional energy sources.”

He noted that “You couldn’t transfer large electric power stations to wind energy, however much you wanted to. In the next few decades, it will be impossible.

He said nuclear energy is the only “real and powerful alternative” to oil and gas.  He rejects other alternative energy approaches as “claptrap.”

Putin’s comments confirm statements made in February by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev who said, “nuclear energy development was a national priority …”  Further stating that, “this is an absolute priority for our power grid development, power generation development and the development of energy potential.” Medvedev said at a meeting with local students.  He said “nuclear energy development also followed the goal of switching to green technology in the fight against global warming.”

In answer to a question about a delayed construction of a specific nuclear facility he said, “once it is mentioned in our program, we will certainly build it, because our power sector has no future without nuclear energy.”

The Russians are coming!  The Russians are coming!

Posted in industrial wind failure, industrial wind poor performance, Nuclear Energy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for September 11, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Maybe if they put up a couple more windmills

2-More bass ackwards, tail-wagging-dog industrial wind logic:

3-Maine Public Utility Commission wants floating wind turbines “at least ten miles from the mainland and inhabited islands, in water at least 300 feet deep.”  We concur with the specifications … how about maybe the Bermuda Triangle?

4-Independent Film Channel reviews “Windfall” – I bet the AWEA can’t wait ’till this hits the US theater near you!

  • Toronto 2010: “Windfall,” Reviewed – “A small farming community in New York finds that wind energy may be nothing more than hot air in Laura Israel’s comprehensive doc.” – IFC

5-Jon Boone suggests the only cure is indeed shutdown–or not building them in the first place.

Posted in Breaking Wind, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment