Allegheny Treasures’ notes:
- Why the use of the term “generating capacity” instead of actual energy output? Perhaps because of the dismal performance expected of these installations.
- Note that few jobs were created even though “America’s wind energy industry enjoyed a banner year in 2009, thanks largely to tax credits and other incentives packed into the $787-billion economic stimulus bill.” Has your local Congressional Representative questioned the technology and the increasing use of your tax dollars to fund the wind scam?
- Mr. Tankersley of the LA Times is not an enemy of green technology. Read his work on Copenhagen, global warming and carbon issues and you’ll find that he is not someone to portray this issue in a negative light were the facts not there to back up his article.
- Is it possible that even the proponents of the industrial wind boondoggle are starting to realize what many critics have been saying is true?
- We’ll see! But for now, take a look at the following article. If you happen to be in a community promised tax revenues and jobs, you might want to check it out again before you allow your lands to be consumed by the poor performing, taxpayer subsidized turbines, likely manufactured oversees thus creating the most jobs there.
From the LA Times, via The National Wind Action Group:
February 1, 2010 by Jim Tankersley in Los Angeles Times
Despite record growth in generating capacity, the industry is creating few employment opportunities overall.
Washington – America’s wind energy industry enjoyed a banner year in 2009, thanks largely to tax credits and other incentives packed into the $787-billion economic stimulus bill.
But even though a record 10,000 megawatts of new generating capacity came on line, few jobs were created overall and wind power manufacturing employment, in particular, fell — a setback for President Obama’s pledge to create millions of green jobs.
Obama has long pitched green jobs, especially in the energy, transportation and manufacturing fields, as a prescription for long-term, stable employment and a prosperous middle class.
But those jobs have been slow to materialize, especially skilled, good-paying, blue-collar jobs such as assembling wind turbines, retrofitting homes to use less energy and working on solar panels in the desert.
On the campaign trail, Obama promised to create some 5 million green jobs over a decade. The stimulus bill approved last year allocated billions of dollars to the clean-energy sector. And the president continued to set high expectations for green-job creation in last week’s State of the Union speech.
Administration officials admit that they are nowhere near that pace. Last month, government economists released their first tally of clean-energy jobs created or saved by the stimulus: 52,000.
Several factors accounted for the slow start, some of them linked to weakness in the overall economy. Electric power demand fell nationwide last year. Electricity from coal and natural gas is still by and large cheaper than wind or solar power. Renewable energy companies, faced with limited demand, often used parts and equipment in stock or imported renewable technology instead of building turbines or solar cells domestically.
Industry analysts and energy company executives said job growth is also hampered by lingering uncertainties in federal energy policy. Those include questions about when or whether existing tax breaks will expire and whether the Senate will pass a climate bill that would make fossil fuels more expensive — and renewable energy more competitive.
The federal stimulus bill spared the wind and solar industries steep job losses last year, executives said.
In the wind industry, the bill saved about 40,000 factory, installation and maintenance jobs, according to the American Wind Energy Assn. The industry had gained as many as 2,000 installation and maintenance jobs in producing the record megawatts of new capacity, but wind power manufacturing lost just as many jobs, the trade group said.
Clean-energy leaders and many outside analysts added that green companies won’t begin hiring in large numbers until the federal government mandates renewable power consumption nationwide and dramatically upgrades the nation’s electric grid.
Wind turbine manufacturers “need more certainty” to add shifts and factories in the United States, said Elizabeth Salerno, director of data and analysis for the wind industry trade group.
“Demand is the trigger,” she said. “But it has to be long-term, stable demand.”
Obama’s advisors said the biggest clean-energy benefits of the stimulus are still to come, and that they have planted the seeds for a green-job proliferation by financing worker training and leveraging tens of billions of dollars in private investment in green technology. The Energy Department projects that U.S. renewable power generation will grow four times faster from 2008 to 2012 than it would have without the stimulus.
“A lot more has to be done if we’re going to realize the president’s vision for a truly transformative clean-energy economy,” said Jared Bernstein, Vice President Joe Biden’s chief economist. “Our administration will pick up where [the stimulus] leaves off and finish the job. The president is completely committed to that.”
Others said the administration’s efforts, including stimulus grants and tax credits that fund some applicants but not others, may have pushed clean-energy investment dollars overseas, particularly to China. Since 2008, China has approved more solar-power capacity than the United States has installed in its history.
“The inconvenient truth for America’s economic recovery is that China’s Communist Party has cultivated a more favorable, predictable and hospitable market for private investments in clean-energy technology and energy infrastructure than the federal government of the United States,” said Alexander “Andy” Karsner, a fellow at the Council on Competitiveness.
Energy Department officials said that instead of focusing on one or two technologies, they have funded a “portfolio of technologies” that will battle for a share of a growing domestic and global market.
“We are not in the business of picking winners,” said Matt Rogers, a senior advisor at the Energy Department who oversees stimulus spending. “We’re creating competition among innovative approaches in the marketplace.”
Global clean-energy competition worries many of the staunchest champions of green jobs in Washington, including Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chaired a hearing on solar jobs in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee last week.
Among the executives testifying was Robert Rogan, senior vice president for ESolar Inc. in Pasadena. Rogan’s young company secured contracts last year for 3,500 megawatts of solar power. One of its projects is set for California; another, in New Mexico, will create hundreds of construction jobs this year.
But the bulk of ESolar’s power installations will come in China, which also provides some components of its solar plants.
In an interview, Rogan credited the stimulus for helping clean-energy companies through a “very bad” year in the American private finance market.
He insisted U.S. solar companies are poised for “explosive” growth, but that to maximize it, they need longer-term incentives and better transmission lines to link solar hot spots, such as the Southwest, and demand centers, such as the East Coast.
This spoof of climate science may be of interest: