Italian Study: “green investments are an ineffective policy for job creation.”

Jon Boone comments on the recent study:  “Are Green Jobs Real Jobs?  The Case of Italy

Mr. Boone’s comments begin:

A new Italian study reviews the evidence for creating so-called “green jobs” and the net effect of green subsidies on employment. The authors are Luciano Lavecchia and Carlo Stagnaro, members of the Bruno Leoni Institute (a well known independent think tank). The study is written in English, although with some clear translation problems. Still, its main points are clear:. Here is an excerpt from the conclusion:

“In this paper we have reviewed the available evidence on green jobs, finding that no conclusive evidence is possible regarding the net effect of green subsidies on total employment. Ac cording to the existing literature, though, the net occupational effect of green subsidies may be positive insofar a country is a technology-producer and –exporter. Italy is neither, which leaves room for a presumption of a negative net impact on employment. Moreover, some studies—most notably Calzada et al. (2009)—find that the net occupational effect may be negative in Spain, which is a technology-producer and –exporter.

In order to assess the situation in Italy, we have first of all estimated the amount of subsidies that have been spent or committed on renewables. To do so we have assumed the country will meet its 2020 “maximum potential” for wind and PV power, as calculated by the Italian Government (2007). This is likely to be an overestimate, leading to overestimating the num- ber jobs that will be created. Then, we have reviewed the existing estimates on the actual number of green jobs. Even though we feel like virtually all these studies overestimate the number of green jobs, we have taken them as a given, in order to use them as a basis for our projection of job creation by 2020. With these data, we have been able to estimate the total stock of capital embodied in the wind and PV capacity that will be on field in 2020, and hence to estimate the average stock of capital per worker.

Finally, we have compared the average stock of capital per worker in the RES with the average stock of capital per worker in the industry and the entire economy, finding an average ratio of 6.9 and 4.8, respectively. To put it otherwise, the same amount of capital that creates one job in the green sector, would create 6.9 or 4.8 if invested in the industry or the economy in general, respectively,—although differences exist between RES themselves, with wind power more likely to create jobs than PV power. This fact is particularly relevant be- cause we didn’t even consider the non-trivial value of the renewable energy produced, but we focused on pure subsidies. If we had considered the energy value, the average stock of capital per worker would result even higher. Since subsidies are forcibly taken away from the economic cycle, and allocated for political purposes, it is especially important to have a clear vision of what consequences they beg.

This does not necessarily mean that the creation of one green job would destroy 7 jobs in the industry. This just suggests what is obvious by anecdotal and financial evidence, i.e. that the green industry is a capital-intensive, not a labor-intensive industry. It is no surprise, there- fore, that green investments generate less jobs than investments in other sectors of the economy, and most notably the industrial sector. This does not even necessarily mean that the green economy is a net loss of resources, although there is some evidence even for this.

The only scope, and we dare to say the only result, of our study is to show that green investments are an ineffective policy for job creation. Regardless to their other merits, that we have not reviewed in this paper, to the extent that the “green deal” is aimed at creating employment or purported as anti-crisis or stimulus policy, it is a wrong policy choice.”

Mr. Boone’s comments conclude.

The complete study can be found at the Istituto Bruno Leoni, and is provided here for your convenience:

AT Note:  Mr. Boone is a  former University Administrator, Environmentalist, Artist, Author, Documentary Producer, and Formal Intervenor in Wind Installation Hearings.  Visit Mr. Boone’s informative web site for an extensive library of his writings at stopillwind

Mr. Boone, at the request of the Sicilian Government, recently addressed the conference which created The Charter of Palermo – To protect Europe’s “essential cultural landscape heritage” from the “leprosy of wind.”

This entry was posted in Industrial wind jobs, Jon Boone, Wind Power subsidies and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Italian Study: “green investments are an ineffective policy for job creation.”

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Italian Study: “green investments are an ineffective policy for job creation.” « Allegheny Treasures -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s