Classic wind developer logic: actual output of 28 MW from 97 MW installed capacity is 97% excellent!

I know … drives me nuts too!  These wind folks have taken the Three Card Monte to incredibly new heights.

Here’s the latest from Oregon.

Suzlon has a press release which included this:  “We are proud to be marking the one-year anniversary of our Oregon projects as they’ve surpassed an average 97 percent availability throughout the first year,” said Andris Cukurs, CEO of Suzlon Wind Energy Corp.

So you might think that 97% is pretty incredible output for wind farms … right up there with fossil and nuclear.  Heck, the 400 MW of Suzlon’s installed capacity in the great state of Oregon would be pumping out 388 MW.  But I thought it odd they didn’t brag about that level of production, since they’re constantly being hammered for the incredibly poor performance of their huge erector sets.

Sure enough, when you look at the statement, there’s that key word – 97% availability.  Gee, where have I seen that before?  So maybe the Suzlon units are in the 25% range, no better than the rest.

Off we go to Horizon Wind Energy, one of the folks running the Suzlon units, where I find the 97 MW Wheat Field Wind Farm.  If there operating at 97% as Suzlon would like you to believe, the output would be around 94 MW.

On Horizon’s web site the list the customer for the electricity from Wheat Field as Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1.  The Snohomish County PUD web site lists Wheat Field as one of it’s wind assets and states this, “This 97 megawatt project is located near the City of Arlington, in north central Oregon. The project has 46 turbines and an estimated annual output of 28 average megawatts.”

Sorry to report that even the Snohomish County PUD number is high.  According to the EIA, the Wheat Field Wind Farm actual 2009 output was, on average, 19.8 MW, a meager 20.4%

I’ll just accept that Mr. Cukurs was trying to find a silver lining in the wind energy cloud.  He really meant that the turbines were ready to turn 97% of the time … if a breeze happened to come by …  with enough ummphh to actually turn the blades … hopefully when someone needed it … and the grid had a space for it.

I don’t think I’ll waste any more time on this.  I should have known better than to believe the wind hype anyway.

If you want, you can dig through the EIA XL spreadsheet to confirm my numbers.  It’s here.

Yes, I know it’s not as easy to read as the IESO wind tracker.  I don’t know why the US wind business makes it so difficult, unless they don’t want you to know.

I’m sure they don’t want my Oregon friends at the Blue Mountain Alliance, the Friends of Grand Ronde Valley and the folks from Stop Wind Farms Here to have ready access to this information either.

Misinformation is the wind developer’s friend.

This entry was posted in Friends and Citizens Groups, industrial wind poor performance, Oregon wind farms and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Classic wind developer logic: actual output of 28 MW from 97 MW installed capacity is 97% excellent!

  1. Paula says:

    The pro-windfarm folks head up the bill at the supposedly “all viewpoints” wind energy forum coming up in two nights in Hood River Oregon, being held at the fanciest hotel in town (who’s paying?), with nearly all the speakers coming from groups associated with wind-energy industry affiliates or insiders. Attempts to get persons on who are knowledgeable experts in opposition to the wind energy have been refused, rather arbitrarily, by the exectutive director of the forum’s sponsor, Hood River Valley Residents Committee. Normally a supporter of the area’s environs and residents’ lives, the HRVRC has taken a weirdly “neutral” stance, before this forum; it received some months ago a Bullett grant, a condition of which is that it not take a stand against wind farms. The HRVRC exec director keeps saying he’s presenting “both sides.” Obviously, given the global giants—GE, Siemens, UTC/Clipper, Dow, etc.–involved in the wind industry–I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised our fight is as hard, and the destruction of our homes and ways of life as callously done, as what is done any group of rural peasants whose area’s (or country’s) energy resources global industry wishes for its own exploitation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s