Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 30, 2010

Items of interest:

1-When all else fails, beg!

Clean Energy Proponents Pin Hopes on Tax Package – National Journal

2-“Two things are missing when it comes to industrial wind — the science and the money!

NYSERDA seeks to ‘transform our economic system’ – The Empire Page

3-Abstracts from the international symposium:

Global Wind Industry and Adverse Health Effects: First International Symposium – National Wind Watch

Note:  Original source and presentation downloads here:  The Society for Wind Vigilance

4-“I know the environmentalists will not be very happy with my decision, but it is foolish romance to think that India can attain high growth rate and sustain the energy needs of a 1.2 billion population with the help of solar, wind, biogas and such other forms of energy.

It’s paradoxical that environmentalists are against nuclear energy: Jairam Ramesh – The Hindu

5-“There is no convincing proof of the ability of utility-scale wind electricity generation to provide any of the incredible benefits claimed for it.

The Calculator: Fossil Fuel Consumption, CO2 Emissions, and Costs with Wind (Part I) – Kent Hawkins at MasterResource

 

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 29, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“Our experience has forced me to look into the deeper issues of industrial wind — the technology, economics and politics — and the investigation has been an uncomfortable journey. It has brought my once-honey-eyed vision of easy, green power to the conclusion that industrial wind energy is, at present, bad science, bad economics and bad politics.

Wind power is bad science, economics – Bangor Daily News  (Visit and support our friends at Fox Islands Wind Neighbors)

2-“Do you understand the predicament Chuck?

Anti-wind Radicals? We’re just regular people trying to protect ourselves – Wind Concerns Ontario

3-“That was until some of the neighbouring farmers started knocking on her door and saying ‘hey Sarah, you’re a doc – what do you know about this getting sick from wind farms business?”

WINDFARM WARNING: do you have a windfarm near you – or planned to be??? – Umatji

4-Yes, but handle with care!

Marcellus Natural Gas Shale Formation Largest Reserve in World – Oil and Gas Drilling

5-Renewables Biz readers respond to recent headlines (h/t – Frank O’Hara)

Wind, Wires and Wallets – Renewables Biz

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 27, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Another sales pitch masquerading as a “wind developer – good neighbor” editorial.  When will we ever learn, when will we ever learn?

Regulating wind farms – The Journal Gazette

2-“Generous state and federal funding for wind power projects has created a recent gold rush in Plymouth and in surrounding towns.”

LETTER: Turbines’ financial flicker – Wicked Local (Plymouth)

3-“Governor Granholm and Barack Obama say the future of Michigan lies in alternative energy like wind power. Their model? Spain

Payne: Granholm’s wind model gets blown away – The Detroit News

4-“Few people realise the extent or extravagance of the subsidy given to the large corporate operators of wind turbines.”

Wind Turbines: The Subsidy – BilloTheWisp

5-Another ill-conceived political mandate!

Study indicates bio fuel worse than fossil fuel – Green Planet Fan

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 26, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Have the citizens of Mineral County, West Virginia been misled about the planned Pinnacle Wind Farm?  Oh, I know it sounds impossible, but …  well, anyway, the smoke screen is lifting and we’ll keep you informed.

2-I say old chap!  Are you calling the wind developer blokes “cynical” opportunist?  Tsk! Tsk!

Residents go on attack at Tallentire wind turbines inquiry – Times and Star

3-Well, you didn’t really expect to find logic in the Administration energy policy, did you?

White House Expedites Wind Farms; Stalls Drilling – Red State

4-“We will not stop protesting until the laws protecting Maine’s environment are restored and wind turbines are banished from the landscape.”

Wind power’s assault on Maine – Bangor Daily News

5-This is rich!  Pennsylvania Department of Homeland Security places actor on terror watch list for challenging natural gas extraction methods.

Mark Ruffalo on terror advisory list – SF Gate

Posted in Breaking Wind, Mineral County WV | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 25, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“Mid-collapse, Spain has finally settled on what it hopes will be the way out of the bankrupting “green economy” subsidies and mandates that President Obama cited as his model.”

Spain Pulls the Plug on Solar Subsidies – Planet Gore

2-Who knows … maybe Congress will get serious about spending cuts: “With Coburn throwing down the gauntlet and saying not even subsidies for the oil and gas industries should be off the table…

GOP battle over ethanol heats up: Grassley swipes at Coburn and DeMint – Washington Post

3-“As stimulus funding has failed to produce industry-claimed green jobs, it will vanish. Wind developers will be seen as carpetbaggers, leaving behind a graveyard wake of 440-foot steel towers with fiberglass, concrete and transmission fluids.”

Another View: Wind protesters really prophets who warn of dire peril ahead – Portland Press Herald

4-Pouring more cold water logic on the industrial wind fantasy.  Excellent site!

Chapter 9.1: Liberal Projections for Future Renewable Power – Ontario Wind Performance

5-Enjoy your turkey, tofu or salad.  But above all, enjoy your day!

 

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 24, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“But law doesn’t take skeptics’ views into account. Environmental regulations compel compliance. Only in the market does the skepticism of the minority become an important player.”

Al Gore’s Important Admission – American Spectator

2-“So what has happened in the last decade regarding industrial wind in bird-sensitive areas?

“Birds of Prey Remain at Risk” (Windpower’s ‘avian mortality’ issue today) – MasterResource

3-Fox Islands Wind Neighbors holding Baker’s feet to fire.  (Thanks Sally!)

DEP: Vinalhaven turbines too loud – Bangor Daily News

4-Hmmm…!  They produce few jobs, minimal electricity and cost a lot of money.  So, what’s the problem?

Wind farms do not mean ‘jobs bonanza’ for Wirral – Wirral Globe

5-Ahhh…!  I love it when they talk green subsidy:  “The Pennsylvania Sunshine Grant breathed wind into the sails of solar,”

Subsidies for energy efficiency dry up – PennLive

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Then the (wind turbine) blades strike another bird. And another. And another. And another.”

If you read nothing else today, spend a few moments absorbing this powerful essay by Kenn Kaufman, a “lifelong birder and naturalist, author of the Kaufman Field Guide to Birds of North America, Lives of North American Birds, and ten other books.”

It would be impossible to select a single comment as representative of this excellent piece, which ultimately is a plea for sanity.  You must simply read the full commentary.  It’s available at this link – “A Long Night’s Journey Into Death

Then consider signing the petition requesting a three-year moratorium on building wind turbines in the most critical areas of stopover habitat in northwest Ohio.

A link to the petition is here.

Many thanks to Jon Boone for drawing our attention to the commentary.

Posted in Bat/Bird Kills, Environment | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 23, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“The future of Électricité de France SA lies primarily in nuclear energy, but probably not in the U.S.”  Yeah, but you’ve got some second hand windmills, we might have a deal.

EDF Looks To Build Nuclear Empire Outside U.S. – Wall Street Journal (Subscription)

2-HELP!  I’m trying to find out what ever happened to this “deal.”  Even the Baltimore Sun link appears to be similarly dead.

Firm Proposes Building Wind Turbines at Two Former Boat-Building Plants in Cumberland, MD Read more

3-First you have to wonder who would think placing wind turbines on Lookout Mountain is a good idea in the first place.  Maybe the petitions should be to remove the numskulls considering approval from their positions.

Commissioners Given Petitions Opposing Lookout Mountain Wind Project – The Chattanoogan

4-à la ethanol?  “One of the properties, he says, has been farmed since 1828.”

Farmland being lost to industrial solar zones – Wind Concerns Ontario

5-Correct!  They don’t conflict because the planes don’t fly in the area.  Core problem solved?  No … but it will kick the can down the political road.

Kansas wind farms don’t conflict with military operations, Army says – Kansas City Star

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Industrial wind … optimism just isn’t enough.

During a long ago conversation, I said to my Dad, “I’m an optimist Pop!  I’m not going through life a pessimist … you know … always seeing the negative side!”  Dad asked if I knew the definition of a pessimist.  Without waiting for my answer he smiled and said, “a pessimist is a person who lends money to an optimist.

What I took from the conversation that followed was that it’s OK to be an optimist, as long as you allow reality to guide you.  This advice, I suppose, is how I moved from supporting wind energy to the conclusion that industrial wind is not a reasonable solution to our energy needs, now or in the future.

Seems a lot of folks want it to work.  I did!  And when the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) and wind developer LLCs painted their picture, it sure looked great.  But as I began to learn more, the wizard behind the curtain was exposed.

Anyway, it appears likely that a 23 turbine project, known as the Pinnacle Wind Farm at New Page, will consume the ridge-line across the Allegheny Front above Keyser, West Virginia.  Some have challenged the powerful that this project will not bring the much needed economic salvation to the community or aid the climate in any significant way.  The quiet voice of reason seems however drowned by emotion.  You see, promise of jobs and increased tax revenue is a sure bet to get the attention of us folks in Mineral County.

If you’ve visited Allegheny Treasures before, you might know that I started out a supporter of wind energy.  It was after being encouraged to look further that I had my conversion from optimistic supporter to skeptical pessimist.  In short, that’s how I got my NIMBY moniker (not in my back yard).  Seems when the wind folks can’t convince you with facts, they and their enablers simply label you with a dismissive term.  Hey, it’s worked pretty well around here!  A little more on that at the end of the post.  For now, suffice it to say I believe the proposed wind farm is not worth the financial and environmental sacrifice.  Unfortunately, we won’t know who’s right and wrong until it’s far too late.

I do hope I’m wrong about the project.  It would be a shame if I’m right because what I believe is, Pinnacle will fail to deliver on its promises, and none of us really wants that result!

Here are some of my concerns:

  • I believe Pinnacle will proceed without any serious attempt by the developer/future owner to comply with the recommendations made by the WV Department of Natural Resources and US Fish and Wildlife Service to protect endangered species.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  Perhaps the developer has made formal application to the USFWS to seek and secure an incidental take permit prior to beginning construction.  But with all the fuss, don’t you think it would have made the local papers?
    • Another gang actually said they would seek the permit, and now their Allegheny Front project is ready to fire up and … you guessed it … no application.  So how much faith do I have that US WindForce, who hasn’t even indicated they have an interest in securing an ITP, will do so?  Zippo!
  • I believe significant killing of bats, birds and yes … eagles will occur in the migratory flyway along which the turbines will be fixed, yet mostly the kills will be kept from the public.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  Perhaps the developer/owner will be different than their neighbor to the south and open it’s area to more than industry paid environmentalists to assess the carnage and, as a result, take appropriate action to resolve, not simply “mitigate,” the problem.
  • I believe the large numbers of temporary jobs projected for construction will reap very few benefits for Mineral County workers as most of the workforce will come from outside of the county.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  Maybe US WindForce guaranteed that significant high level hires (say more than 50%) will be Mineral County residents.  Now this would be front page stuff, for sure!
  • I believe the number of temporary construction jobs is purposely not defined and that the actual labor content will be significantly less than the number US WindForce allows to “float” in the press.
    • Of course, I could be wrong, but the only true measure of work is labor hours and the last US WindForce work schedule I saw only shows a time-line of activities, not actual labor content.
  • I believe, if weighed against the cost to taxpayers for subsidizing employment, the construction jobs will be a net negative to the US economy.
    • Of course, I could be wrong and perhaps US WindForce will accept no subsidy or taxpayer provided benefit to apply to labor cost and equipment.
  • I believe there will be few local permanent jobs following construction.
    • Of course, I could be wrong that, beyond the half dozen jobs suggested as operating the power plant, a significant tourism industry will sprout up to support the dozens of busloads of sightseers who will come to town to view the turbines.  (I am, of course, ready with my lemonade stand just in case!)
  • I believe the developer/owner will seek Federal and State financial benefits via tax credits/subsidy schemes with the ultimate effect of paying taxes due with taxpayer dollars received.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  But the issues was, in fact, raised in the WV PSC final order:  “In the Application, Pinnacle indicated that the federal government is considering programs that could provide funding to foster the development of renewable energy projects, Pinnacle might seek funding under the program, and if it does so, Pinnacle will promptly make any disclosures required by the Commission’s Siting Rules. It is reasonable to require Pinnacle to advise the Commission if it receives any public funding for the project so that the Commission can reopen this proceeding and perform the Part Two analysis that W. Va. Code 5 24-2- 1 1 c requires.
    • As a personal aside, I’m amazed how this subsidy driven industry can be supported by anyone claiming to be a fiscal conservative.
  • I believe the ultimate owner will quickly seek, and receive reassessment and tax relief from the state to reduce its burden, thereby reducing the level of payment promised to the local community.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  Perhaps US WindForce and future owners will not follow their compatriots and heck … maybe they’ve contractually committed not to seek reassessment.  Tickle me Elmo, if that’s the case.
  • I believe the 23 turbines will produce electricity at less than 25% of their rated nameplate capacity, and will produce primarily during off peak demand hours.  (In other words, the site will require consumption of land and air space for 23 turbines to generate the equivalent of perhaps 6 turbines.)
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  But will the Pinnacle owners provide real time, user friendly and publicly accessible reporting of production output for each of the turbines in order to verify performance?  Why, of course, the fiscally conservative supporter of wind farms would say.  Well, let’s see them pass that law in Charleston!
  • I believe the wind farm will not reduce the consumption of coal or other fossil fuels or, in fact, reduce carbon emissions as claimed.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  And admittedly, this is not a purely “local” issue, but a number of folks have this feel good attitude about industrial wind as “green” and, well, they should hear the other side of the argument.  Take a look … you’ll be amazed.
  • I believe that the project will “sell” far more than 100% of its “renewable value” to entities seeking to comply with politically established goals.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  You have to think that the purchase by two Maryland agencies of 100% of the output would pretty much wrap it up.  There’s no way, you say, that partial landlord New Page Paper Company or any other “connected by simply being nearby” entity would attempt to claim some advantage as a member of the “green” team.  Right … and I have my tooth under the pillow for tonight’s visitor!
  • I believe, at the end of their “useful life,” the large burden for removal will fall upon the residents of the county.
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  But I think the hard push to have this project completed will perhaps blind our local leaders to the pitfalls involved in deconstructing these over sized erector sets and hauling them away.

Why such a pessimist, you ask?  Because I believe there’s been no serious inquiry of US WindForce locally to challenge any of my beliefs.

The developer has had a cake walk through this community.  From newspaper accounts, it appears they have not been engaged in any serious debate, at least that I’ve seen.  Having personally attended two sessions over the past year when a number of these same challenges were raised and the leaders of US WindForce had the opportunity to counter, they did not.

And, oh yeah … that NIMBY thing.  I recall back in March of 2009 while still forming my position on the proposed wind farm, one of our local “reporters” lead his article about the wind project with, “as a human, which most reporters are, one cannot truly be free of bias. The trick is to keep it out of your reporting, as opposed to column-izing.  After 20 years in the newspaper business, and no complaints of substance, I believe I’m up to the task.”  He then promptly suggested opponents of industrial wind “need perspective beyond the back yard” and are perhaps, unable to accept “change, growth, evolution.”  The reporter further chastised that “a species or society that does not embrace it, stagnates and dies for lack of it.”  Needless to say, the only “task” he was “up to” was shameless promotion of the wind farm.  The article is still worth a read as an example of utter silliness and poor “reporting.”  Note:  Search Mineral Daily archives for “Answers and energy, blowing in the wind” – May 26, 2009.  (archive link won’t embed)

Yes, it is likely the Pinnacle Wind Farm at New Page will be built, and I suspect construction will begin in time to insure the developer/owner won’t miss feeding time at the US taxpayer money trough.

But I also believe the much touted temporary jobs will soon be forgotten, the grumbling and complaints will grow and the grand scrape for what was promised will suddenly have some folks around here scratching their heads, all of which brings me to my last concern:

  • I believe our once best wind developer “neighbors” will be long gone, off to sell another set of mountain top propeller hats to some other hapless community.  The commitments made to the Mineral County community will be handled by some distant committee who could care less and our kids will be left to mop up after us asking, “What the hell were you people thinking?”
    • Of course, I could be wrong.  And boy, I really hope I am!
Posted in Allegheny Mountains, Mineral County WV, Pinnacle Wind Farm | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for November 22, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Guess who’s rethinking Ethanol:  “I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president.”  Hopefully, since at least one CO2 trading scam folded last month, this admission is number two in the long list of reversals for the former, now very wealthy VEEP.

Gore: Hey, sorry about that whole “stupidly burning 40% of the US corn crop” thing – Tom Nelson

2-“This gives the impression that gas is there solely to support wind. Not true.”

Gas and wind on the Ontario grid – not a chicken or egg thing – Wind Concerns Ontario

3-“popping up across the country at such a rate that it has been called the “wind rush” and there are billions of dollars to be made.”  Heh!  And you thought it was all about saving the planet!

The Power of Wind – Electro Velocity

4-Excellent article linked at the Wind Turbine Syndrome site:

An Ill Wind Blowing? – WTS

5-Jon Boone forwards this bit of good news:

AES Wind letter to Indiana landowners: Leases will lapse – Industrial Wind Action Group

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment