Ontario Wind Performance “If you are not sitting, do so”

Ontario Wind Performance is back with a stunner – Chapter 3.5.3: The Cost of Wind

As the opening paragraph warns:  “If you are not sitting, do so.  If you don’t have nose tissue, get some.  This chapter is going to be a ride of disbelief.”

In a comment to one of our posts a couple of weeks ago, the author of OWP said of the site, “Still under construction, adding more daily.

Well, I suspect this is one construction the wind industry in Ontario won’t want to see completed.  It is well worth your time to visit the OWP site, regardless of your location in the world.  The facts exposed by Ontario Wind Performance about Ontario’s wind business is a cautionary tale for all.

While you’re there, don’t forget to sign up to receive their email alerts.

(Thanks to Jon Boone for forwarding the post.)

Posted in industrial wind cost, Industrial wind quick facts, Ontario Wind Performance | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 10, 2010

Items of interest:

1-European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) supports efforts of Society for Wind Vigilance health symposium.  We do as well!

Letter of support from EPAW-members in Germany – Wind Concerns Ontario

2-Good selection of recent reads recommended by the SPPI Blog – some may even appear familiar to regular readers of AT.

Posts Tagged ‘wind energy’ – SPPI

3-Darn!  I was going to write something like this, but JLL does such an excellent job!

Wind for Jobs? – Jefferson’s Leaning Left

4-If Cape Wind goes forward, electric customers “will be needlessly paying billions of dollars in electric bills and subsidies to line the pockets of a private developer,’’ says Audra Parker of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, the project’s main opposition group.

Cape Wind backers blew right by cost – Boston Globe

… and, you know I just couldn’t pass on the opportunity to show one of my favorites:

5-Industrial wind in the great North West – it really is all about money.

Washington’s wind power windfall – The Columbian

 

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 9, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“Fast-growing China has been rushing to clinch access to overseas resources needed to power its booming industries.”

China’s CNOOC to buy 2.6 million tons of liquefied natural gas from France’s GDP Suez – Washington Examiner

2-“The federal government has agreed to share some of the financial risk involved in building the world’s largest wind farm in northeast Oregon.”  The whole idea sounds loony and a little scarier when you substitute “your name” for “federal government.”

World’s largest wind farm gets stimulated (finally) – Ecotrope

3-“In fact, because wind power is not economically viable at the moment, funding wind farms is the equivalent of preemptively bailing them out.”

Russ Quixote and the Wind Farm Bailout – Reboot Congress

4-And if I were 7’2”, 380lbs with 4.4 – 40 time, I’d be playing for the Steelers – one of the silliest wind energy advertisements articles of the week, in my humble opinion.

Offshore Wind a U.S. Job Boon if Capital Costs Don’t Erode Potential – DOE – New York Times

5-“Huron (MI) County officials earlier this week reported there’s been some confusion regarding two Nov. 2 county ballot proposals that ask voters to confirm the creation of two new wind districts.”

Nah!!! I read the piece … how could this be confusing?

Wind district questions answered – Huron Daily Tribune

6-Finally, some interesting goings on out in Wisconsin … probably an isolated case, don’t you think?

Wisconsin PSC’S wind energy siting rules challenged in court. – Allegheny Treasures

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Wisconsin PSC’S wind energy siting rules challenged in court.

“The battle here in WI rages on!” – Fran Kunz

According to the filing, “the Wisconsin Public Service Commission (“PSC”) has been sued for failing to conduct an environmental review of the agency’s recently proposed wind energy siting rules under the Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act, Wis. Stat. § 1.11 (“WEP A”), and for failing to design the proposed rules to reflect a balance between wind energy siting, private property rights, and local comprehensive land use planning goals.”

Pertinent documents follow:

The Release Summary:

And the details of the lawsuit:

 

For additional information about Wisconsin wind energy issues, please visit WINDCOWS – Wisconsin Independent Citizens Opposing Windturbine Sites

Thanks to our friend Fran Kunz for providing us with this information.

Posted in Environment, Friends and Citizens Groups | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 8, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“For many of you, the good news is that you’re not an Appalachian miner. Or living in a town dependent on those miners’ producing abundant, reliable, politically assailed energy resources. Or a farmer or rancher or living in such a community out West. Your livelihood isn’t under assault by the full force of the federal government. Yet.

You just depend on what these fellow Americans do to make you richer, freer, and safer.

Obama vs. West Virginia Coal – National Review Online

2-From Moe Lane: Connecting the dots on the Missouri wind farm payoff.

3-“If we truly wanted to achieve zero environmental impact with wind turbines we would have to place them in a vacuum, but we should settle for a region without bird migratory routes and with high background atmospheric turbulence.”

Most efficient wind farm layout is also the least disruptive – ars technica

4-From Roger Pielke, Sr.: “While their conclusions are important with respect to how wind turbine farms can alter surface air temperatures, their results have an even broader importance.

On the Vertical Mixing Of Heat And Long Term Surface Temperature Trends – Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.

5-More thoughts on Russia/China cooperation.

China and Russia Finally Tie the Knot – Energy Tribune

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Glenn Schleede on “Senator Bingaman’s Insidious National “Renewable Electricity Standards” bill, S. 3813” (Update)

Glenn Schleede goes beyond the usual arguments against the Bingaman bill.  He deals with some of the economic harm and with fallacies underlying government attempts to pick technology “winners” and force them into the US economy.

Mr. Schleede suggests that you express your views to your senators or representative before the November 2 election as, win or lose, the candidates will be noticeably less interested in listening to constituents after the election.

Mr. Schleede also urges concerned readers to consider including the members’ “local” offices among your contacts.  Your views may get more attention there than when they return to Washington.

You can find local (i.e., “state” or “district” offices — with addresses, telephone and fax numbers — by going to the members’ web sites — which you can find by going to www.senate.gov or www.house.gov.

We thank Mr. Schleede for allowing us to post his work, provided here for your convenience:

(We were advised by Mr. Schleede that the date listed on page one should be 2021 and NOT 2013.  This version reflects the correction.)

Allegheny Treasures Note:  “Mr. Schleede is the author of many papers and reports on energy matters.  He is now retired but continues to analyze and write about federal and state energy policies, particularly those affecting wind energy.”

“Until retiring, Schleede maintained a consulting practice, Energy Market and Policy Analysis, Inc. (EMPA)  Prior to forming EMPA, Schleede was Vice President of New England Electric System (NEES), Westborough, MA, and President of its fuels subsidiary, New England Energy Incorporated. Previously, Schleede was Executive Associate Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1981), Senior VP of the National Coal Association in Washington (1977) and Associate Director (Energy and Science) of the White House Domestic Council (1973).  He also held career service positions in the U.S. OMB and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.”

“He has a BA degree from Gustavus Adolphus College and an MA from the University of Minnesota.  He is also a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.

Posted in Glenn Schleede, Renewable energy debate | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 7, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“But Cape Wind’s stipulated low fees are nevertheless yet another example of the government assisting development of wind power and other renewable-energy technologies. Cape Wind is also expected to be reimbursed about $600 million, via tax credits, after expected construction of the $2 billion wind farm.”

Feds award Cape Wind a sweet 28-year lease deal – Boston Herald

2-We in the US should “take note” as well, don’t you think?

Brits to pay $3200 per year for power bill. Ontarians take note. – Wind Concerns Ontario

3-“You see, just like back in the 1980’s when modern wind energy was first being touted and subsidized, national leaders are waking up to the fact that wind is the sucker’s choice and some of the sucker’s now realize they’ve been had.”

Time for Voters for Wind to write some letters. – Jefferson’s Leaning Left

4-Now here’s a bit of common sense creeping in!

PSEG Chairman: Keep transmission focused on grid reliability, not new policy goals – Industrial Wind Action Group

5-As usual, there’s no mention of the actual expected output, even if they do “increase the number of wind turbines planted among area corn and soybean fields from 705 to more than 2,772 in five years, according to data from Illinois State University’s Center for Renewable Energy.”

Central Illinois may gain 2,000 turbines in 5 years – Pantagraph.com

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 6, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Head of the Russian nuclear corporation: “We nearly doubled the most profit-making reserves. And we increased natural uranium production by 13% year-on-year in the first nine months of 2010

Russia increases uranium production 13% in 2010 – Rosatom – RIA Novosti

2-Woosh-Woosh – “Lawsuits and complaints about turbine noise, vibrations and subsequent lost property value have cropped up in Illinois, Texas, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Massachusetts, among other states. In one case in DeKalb County, Ill., at least 38 families have sued to have 100 turbines removed from a wind farm there. A judge rejected a motion to dismiss the case in June.”

“For Those Near, the Miserable Hum of Clean Energy” (NY Times) – Wind Turbine Syndrome

3-“If all these proposed projects get built out, this wonderful, stunningly scenic place we have spent public tax money to preserve will have around 100 huge industrial wind turbines surrounding it.”  (Not to mention wind won’t work!)

A Hike up Rumford Whitecap Before the Onslaught of Turbines – Citizen’s Task Force on Wind Power, Maine

4-Longtime plans to construct a wind farm in Randolph County have been put off, at least for now, because Indiana officials are so far unwilling to commit to more renewable energy across the state.  (Yes, but you’ll thank them later!)

State policy delays wind farm – The Star Press

5-Must be nearing an election somewhere.  Remember when the White House said no to solar panels in September?

White House Solar Installation Symbolic of Solar Energy Push – The Foundry

Excellent!  “So not only will taxpayers have to foot the bill for the project, but they’ll also be paying for pricier electricity.

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Market Watch: “It’s time to expose the myth that nuclear power is more costly than wind, solar and other renewables.”

Nuclear Plants Produce Lower Cost Power Than Other Forms of New Clean Energy, Such as Wind and Solar, Says CEO (Don Gillispie) of Alternate Energy Holdings

A 45-year veteran of the nuclear industry, Gillispie has the experience and numbers to back up his assertions. His company is preparing to build two big 1700-megawatt (MWe) nuclear plants in Payette County, Idaho that will produce electricity more cheaply than new wind and solar can, by a long shot.

The full article at the link.

Posted in industrial wind cost, Nuclear Energy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 5, 2010

Items of interest:

1-More on “free” wind:  “And experts say most of those costs will be passed on to the same consumers who, as rate- and taxpayers, will be paying for the cost of planting the turbines off Nantucket Sound – and footing higher energy bills once the project is running.

Cape Wind rates will whack businesses, hospitals, schools – Boston Herald  (Surprise!!!)

2-Thought we’d take advantage of the rather slow day to provide a few recent examples of China’s push for “green” energy.  From their People’s Daily Online:

Russian coal imports up – September 9, 2010 (repaying a loan?)

Coal consumption to fall – September 16, 2010 (Check out the reasons)

Ukraine, China sign memorandum on cooperation in coal industry – September 24, 2010

China, Mongolia plan to jointly build new highway for coal transportation – October 5, 2010  (Hmmm … this wouldn’t have anything to do with other cooperation, would it?)

If you have some idle time, follow the links provided with each above.  The articles are quick reads but, when tied together … well, you decide.

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment