Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 23, 2010

Items of interest:

1-The Industrial Wind Action Group has a great weekly email wrap-up of topical articles.

Go here to subscribe.  Of course it’s free!

2-The other day we suggested the Roanoke Times insist wind developers prove their “eco-friendly” claims.  Times reader Carol Wright had this to say about wind farms:

Wind farms are just the latest flimflam – Roanoke Times

3-If you haven’t had the chance to view the excellent Allegheny Highlands Alliance video which builds “The case for Wind Turbine Decommissioning, Dismantling and Removal Requirements,” now’s a great time to do so.

When it comes to industrial wind, as in all things – “Listen to Your Mother” – Allegheny Treasures

4-And the US is building windmills!  “The reserves of North Mogdinsk are estimated at around 14.8 million tons, INK said in a report, although Buinov said they could in fact amount to as much as 50 million tons.”

Russian, Japanese companies to invest $300 million in East Siberian oil, gas projects – Ria Novosti

5-“America can’t afford to shut down the fossil fuels that make our jobs and living standards possible – or slap huge new climate change taxes on them – before we have a real alternative to replace them, not just mirages.”

Wind power mirages – Would generating more electricity from wind really help poor families or the environment? – ICECAP

 

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 22, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Discussion of subsidies worth your time.

More on Cape Cod Wind Power – Bruce Everett’s Weblog

2-“Just like BP’s compromised relationship with the federal agency responsible for regulating it in order to promote energy development in ecologically sensitive areas, so too the wind energy developers have been very cozy with government policy makers in order to develop energy in environmentally sensitive areas.”

Wind on the Mountains; Politics in the Valleys – Vermont Tiger

3-Horse meet cart – Oregon, having “boosted wind energy projects with a vengeance in recent years, adopting a renewable power standard and tax breaks that have helped spread wind farms across the state’s northern reaches and into eastern Oregon,” is now “embarking on a public health assessment of wind farms.

Oregon to study wind farm health effects – Oregon Live

4-GE sells interest in Oklahoma wind farm to Japanese firm.

ITOCHU Joins General Electric by Co-investing in Oklahoma Wind Farm – PR Newswire

5-Reminds me of the Jon Boone caution of a few days ago:  “the PATH line through MD, WV, PA may use eminent domain to bully its way through opposition–and much of the justification for PATH is to bring green energy to the masses.“  He notes that “people should be more than worried!

Eminent domain, landownership and transmission line structures – Industrial Wind Action Group

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

When it comes to industrial wind, as in all things – “Listen to Your Mother”

The Allegheny Highlands Alliance presents:

Listen to Your Mother – The case for Wind Turbine Decommissioning, Dismantling and Removal Requirements”

AT Note:  The Allegheny Highlands Alliance (AHA) is a consortium of citizen/environment organizations with membership in five states along the Allegheny Front.  The AHA is in the process of discovering the facts about industrial wind, its potential to reduce green house gases, its economics and the impact of industrial wind energy project installations on the ecology and human health.

The purposes of AHA shall include but not be limited to the following:

(A) To advance public knowledge and understanding of the cultural, biological, environmental diversity, uniqueness, and sensitivity of the major ridgelines that comprise the Allegheny Highlands;

(B) To preserve and protect areas of particular scenic, geologic, biologic, historic, wilderness, and/or recreational importance in the Allegheny Highlands;

(C) To aid in the establishment of responsible policies to protect scientific, educational or aesthetic values;

(D) To conduct regional and resource studies as a basis for the wise use of the various resources of the Allegheny Highlands; to develop programs in energy conservation and wise production; and to serve local communities, the region,  the people of the Allegheny Highlands as an agency for popular enlightenment, for cultural improvement, and for scientific advancement;

(E) To advocate governmental policies for the conservation and wise management of energy and natural resources of the Allegheny Highlands.

AHA Contact Larry Thomas, President at larryvthomas@aol.com

Posted in Allegheny Highlands Alliance, Allegheny Mountains, Appalachian Mountains | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 21, 2010

Items of interest:

1-And, of course, no one could have possibly dreamed this: “China, which has been blocking shipments of crucial minerals to Japan for the last month, has now quietly halted some shipments of those materials to the United States and Europe, three industry officials said this week.”

China Said to Widen Its Embargo of Minerals – NY Times

2-That reminds me … how’s your neighbor’s network of gas pipelines coming along?

Russia, Bulgaria to set up JV for South Stream feasibility study by Nov 15 – Ria Novosti

3-Burning coal to run the Chevy Volt?  But …

The Chevy Volt Runs on Coal – Planet Gore

4-Ignore the politics for a moment – but who, in their right mind, would want to tie their legacy to giving 70 major wind farms $4.4 billion in federal energy grants through the stimulus program?

Hot air? White House takes credit for Bush-era wind farm jobs – MSNBC

5-Baltimore Sun carries more water for Maryland’s first wind farm in their “green” section.  Oh, not propaganda?  Then why did the Sun link a Cumberland Times-News story that’s 10 days old?

Western MD turbines set to make power? – Baltimore Sun

6-Hey folks!  The amount of money handed to the renewable energy developers is not the true measure of “green” success.  You might think so if you read this article.

How will the spending review affect the environment? – The Guardian

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 20, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Remember the “block of ice” post urging folks to really understand the “promises” of economic benefit related to wind farms?

Wind farms would give taxpayers different options – Sun Journal

2-“And the wind farm developers get to optimize their returns and the landowners who are negatively affected by all this will get squat.”

Bottled wind, or where are our electrons going to go? – Watertown Daily News

3-“Solar photovoltaics are not cost competitive at present, with several studies finding them two to five times as expensive as nuclear reactors.”

Solar Cheaper than Grid Nuclear? Think Again! – MasterResource

4-And the US is building windmills:   “Days after clinching a deal with Russia to build his country’s first nuclear power plant,” Hugo Chavez was in Tehran to “focus on expanding cooperation in the hydrocarbon and petrochemical sectors.  On the agenda are the plans for a joint oil shipping company and joint construction of petrochemical plants, as well as Venezuelan participation in the exploitation of Iran’s South Pars gas field.

Chavez in Iran for talks on energy, trade – Breitbart

5-“Wind energy is the environmentalists’ great energy hope, but two inconvenient truths seem to come between fantasy and reality.”

Wind Energy: The Truth Blows – Energy Tribune

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Should wind farms be required to back up their “eco-friendly” claims?

Today’s Roanoke Times has an interesting little editorial titled “What ‘green’ should mean.

Seems the FTC is planning to watch product labeling a little closer and challenge folks who mislead the public in an attempt to sell their product.

The editorial stated that the Federal Trade Commission would be changing labeling rules for products claiming to be “green.”  In an attempt to rein in manufacturers who boast their products are “eco-friendly,” the FTC thinks manufacturers should back up their claims.

We couldn’t agree more!

In fact, we think the Roanoke Times missed a great opportunity to demonstrate their implied support of the “back up their claims” concept right in their own back yard.  After all, if the Roanoke Times is sincere about manufacturers and suppliers proving their “eco-friendly” claims, you would think the massive industrial wind turbines planned for Poor Mountain might be on the paper’s hit list.  I mean, they can’t exactly say they’re unaware.

The wind developer’s claims to replace fossil fuel power plants, reduce carbon emissions and provide a reliable stream of clean, green and cheap electricity while consuming hundreds of acres of woodlands would certainly seem to deserve a little scrutiny.

Serious scientists and engineers dispute the claims of the wind developers.  Their works are not that hard to find, if you look beyond the fawning press printing only the wind lobby’s boilerplate.  Heck, we’re a small potatoes blog and we’ve got a couple of hundred posts dedicated to the writings of these experts.

One of the best resources available for serious discussion of industrial wind’s claims is in the Editor’s back yard – VA Wind.  We’ve linked a bunch of others over there on the left of the page.

So, Mr./Ms. Editor … how about if your paper takes its own editorial advice seriously?  Maybe you could question the claims of the self-proclaimed “eco-friendly” wind farm that will impact your readers far longer and more dramatically than a bottle of cleaning liquid.

Don’t leave it up to your neighbors to, as you say, “act as the “green” police.”

How about using your “power of the pen” to help them out.

Oh, by the way … the FTC is holding a comment period on the “Green Guides” revisions open to public comment until Dec. 10.  Maybe we should all write to the FTC to ask they include wind turbines and have the manufacturers, developers and lobby groups prove they can “back up their claims.”  It sure doesn’t seem the Department of Energy cares.

Posted in Appalachian Mountains, Environment | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 19, 2010

Items of interest:

1-Folks in Western Maryland know what it is to honor a commitment.  For one thing, you’ve got to be strong enough to stay in the game long enough to fulfill it.

At this point I think it’s fair to say that Shattuck, Constellation’s chief executive, has lost all credibility – with the public, with the industry and, to judge from Constellation’s stock price, even with investors.” – Steven Pearlstein

Constellation’s fallout with French firm unfortunately the new business as usual – Washington Post

2-What’s good for New Mexico is not good for Vermont.  (Of course, to us, industrial wind is not good, anywhere.)

Wind facilities are not a good option for Vermont – The Valley Reporter

3-Excellent presentation, well worth your time!

Does Wind Energy Benefit Idaho State and the Local Communities? – Idahoans for Responsible Wind Energy

4-“If the non-wind sources of power are supplying our Ontario demand, and there is excess demand as we have now, then the rest must be exported.”  (You’ll never guess where it’s going!  More to follow.)

Then where is Wind all Going? – Ontario Wind Performance

5-And, in honor of the return of the bedbug – a chuckle from our friends over at Windtoons.

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 18, 2010

Items of interest:

1-“The purpose of the Act (Wind Energy Siting Reform Act) is to achieve the governor’s goal of shoehorning massive industrial wind turbines into our once quiet and rural neighborhoods through a careless set of special wind industry benefits that include overriding local control, replacing environmental laws with “standards,” and eliminating traditional rights of participation and appeal by the public.”

YOUR VIEW: Wind act will eliminate local review authority – South Coast Today

2-PSA:  The Society for Wind Vigilance announces its first International Symposium

The Society for Wind Vigilance – International SymposiumMidwest Society for Acoustic Ecology

3-Well, I’ll be hornswoggled!

Endangered bats in region scuttle plans to build wind farms in northwest Arkansas – KSPR33

4-“European energy giant Vattenfall has announced that it will not seek permission to extend the world’s largest wind farm, Thanet, due to there not being enough time for the necessary grid upgrades to support it.”

Vattenfall scraps plans to extend Thanet offshore wind farm – Your Industry News

5-“Unlocking decades’ worth of natural gas deposits … has upended the ambitious growth plans of companies that produce power from wind, nuclear energy and coal. Those plans were based on the assumption that supplies of natural gas would be tight, and prices high.”

Natural gas proves to be energy game-changer – Houston Chronicle Online

6-“There will come a day when someone devises an economical alternative or alternatives to coal and oil. But that day will not come just because eco-friendly politicians and activists wish it so.”

Lights out on PEI’s wind power dream – Wind Concerns Ontario

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | 1 Comment

“Write it down on a block of ice.” UPDATE

My dad liked that phrase … “Write it down on a block of ice!”  He used to tell me that when I’d do a chore and tell him I was going to send him a bill.

Sometimes, when I read articles about politician’s campaign promises or the latest “Billy Mays” product claim, I have to chuckle.  I can hear my dad saying, “write it down on a block of ice.”

Over the past year or so, I’ve become very interested in industrial wind and I read a lot of articles on the topic.  I’ve got my web reader searching for a few key words and folks occasionally send me an article of interest.  Obviously, I’m very interested in the articles concerning industrial wind in the Alleghenies.

This morning, a friend who happens to be a member of the Allegheny Highlands Alliance (Note 2), sent this article from the Somerset County Pennsylvania Daily American –New windfarm planned for Somerset.

The article announces plans for a new wind farm of some 60 turbines to be built in Somerset County.  According to the author, the 8,500 acre farmwill generate up to 150 MW“, “which is enough energy to power more than 40,000 homes.”  The article also states that the developer “will pay the townships $1,600 per megawatt,” from which four townships “are expected to share up to $240,000 a year.”

So, what does that really mean?  If you happen to notice the popular “up to,” you start to get a clue.

The wind energy’s trade association, AWEA, estimates that turbines actually produce between 25% to 40% of their nameplate capacity.  Actual operation reports have very often demonstrated much less, but for the sake of this argument, we’ll be generous and use the AWEA average of 33%.

If you discount the “generate up to” 150 MW to the 33% AWEA estimate, the actual generation would be around 51 MW.

The article says the townships will be paid $1,600 per MW.  If we use the AWEA figure  – 51 MW, we find the article perhaps should have stated the more realistic “up to” $81,600 for the four townships to share.  The $240,000 the article suggests would require the units to run at an unheard of 100% of nameplate capacity.  In fairness, the author might not have been provided this information for the article.  After all, it’s not exactly the headline at the AWEA home page.

As far as the 200 temporary construction jobs … unless the developer firmly commits to employing local contractors with the heavy lift cranes, earth movers and qualified trades required for construction, these resources will likely come from outside the immediate area.  It’s important to note that not all 200 workers touted will be on site working from the start to the finish.  You folks in Somerset county might want to ask how many “labor hours” will be generated by the construction that will include “guaranteed” local labor.  It’s a much better measure.  Good luck getting that, by the way!

As far as the other benefits, income and revenues to landowner’s, local business and governments in the form of direct payments and real estate taxes … make sure they write the commitment down on paper.  Often, the wind developers rely on computer generated economic models to provide the figures rattled off in the article and, when challenged under oath, the folks providing the estimates will tell you there is no way to go back later to prove what they were predicting would happen, actually did (Note 1).  Also, it’s not uncommon for wind developers to approach state level government for relief from the tax payment levels originally agreed to and, not at all unusual for the state level to grant relief.

Don’t get me wrong!  Just because I happen to believe industrial wind is a dismal energy producer and only serves as a tax shelter for large companies, doesn’t mean you need to accept my opinion.

But, if you residents of Somerset County believe, from reading this article, that the great financial benefits listed are “iced,” you might want to go back and make sure they didn’t simply “write it down on a block of ice.”

Allegheny Treasures Note 1:

Note 1:   From October 2009 Testimony before the WV PSC  (Original and complete testimony available at the WV PSC website)

Pinnacle Wind Force, LLC Case # 09-0360-E-CS

Pages 19 and 20

(WV PSC)COMMISSIONER ALBERT:

12 Is there any — are there any

13 empirical —? Other than correcting your data as you go

14 forward, do you do any empirical studies on each project

15 to determine whether your projection of that project

16 matches actuality or can that even be done? I’m not —

17 I —.

18 A. (Consultant Michael Jin) Yeah. It’s hard to be done like this because,

19 you know, in reality we really don’t know, you know. The

20 economic impact would be realized in a certain way, you

21 know, I mean, unless you talk to the state, talk to the

22 county people, you know, to see if they do see those —

23 for example, the tax revenues and those type of things we

24 have to, you know, do — have to talk to the people in

25 the field. Then you can know if it’s severe or not.

COMMISSIONER 1 ALBERT:

2 All right.

3 A. But this is an estimate.

UPDATE:  Readers requested the source of Mr. Jin’s testimony so we provide the following Scribd document for your review.  For the original source, please visit the WV PSC web page.

Allegheny Treasures Note 2:

The Allegheny Highlands Alliance (AHA) is a consortium of citizen/environment organizations with membership in five states along the Allegheny Front.  The AHA is in the process of discovering the facts about industrial wind, its potential to reduce green house gases, its economics and the impact of industrial wind energy project installations on the ecology and human health.

The purposes of AHA shall include but not be limited to the following:

(A) To advance public knowledge and understanding of the cultural, biological, environmental diversity, uniqueness, and sensitivity of the major ridgelines that comprise the Allegany Highlands;

(B) To preserve and protect areas of particular scenic, geologic, biologic, historic, wilderness, and/or recreational importance in the Allegheny Highlands;

(C) To aid in the establishment of responsible policies to protect scientific, educational or aesthetic values;

(D) To conduct regional and resource studies as a basis for the wise use of the various resources of the Allegheny Highlands; to develop programs in energy conservation and wise production; and to serve local communities, the region,  the people of the Allegheny Highlands as an agency for popular enlightenment, for cultural improvement, and for scientific advancement;

(E) To advocate governmental policies for the conservation and wise management of energy and natural resources of the Allegheny Highlands.

Posted in Allegheny Mountains, industrial wind poor performance, Industrial Wind Taxes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Wind – Quick hits from the industry for October 17, 2010

Items of interest:

1-  “I oppose the wind siting rules, because they are not based in scientific and medical research and will fail to protect human health and safety.”

10/16/10 Testimony presented at the Oct 13th Senate Committee Hearing on PSC wind rules from Carl and Sandra Johnson. – Better Plan Wisconsin

2-  So incredibly misleading, I don’t know where to begin!

Let Calvert Cliffs 3 die – Baltimore Sun

3-I guess you had to see this coming.

China rejects US clean energy probe, says Washington may unfairly help own industry – LA Times

4-Wyoming “lawmakers may strip merchant, or nonregulated, wind energy companies of eminent domain authority for “connector” lines that move power from wind farms to main, interstate transmission lines.”  Heck, I didn’t realize “merchant, or nonregulated wind energy companies” even had this option in the first place!

Jon Boone reminded me that, “the PATH line through MD, WV, PA may use eminent domain to bully its way through opposition–and much of the justification for PATH is to bring green energy to the masses.”  He notes that “people should be more than worried!

Against the wind?: Tax policy may be hurting Wyoming industry – Billings Gazette

Posted in Breaking Wind | Tagged | Leave a comment